The financial gulf between Celtic and Rangers is stark, with the Glasgow side enjoying significant advantages in sponsorship, marketing, and kit deals. Celtic’s player-trading model has also proven successful in the transfer market, allowing the club to reap dividends. In contrast, Rangers have struggled financially, posting millions of pounds in losses since 2012 and relying on a takeover by the 49ers Enterprises to stay afloat.
Alan Brazil, a former player and pundit, has expressed doubts about Rangers’ ability to compete with Celtic financially. Despite the recent injection of £20 million into the club, Brazil believes that Rangers still lack the financial muscle to make significant signings. “The difference between Celtic and Rangers is that Celtic are very, very comfortable financially,” Brazil said. “Rangers are not. They haven’t been for years and years.”
Dean Saunders suggested that Rangers are still recovering from their past financial struggles, including a period of administration. However, Brazil disputed this notion, pointing out that Rangers have had 13 years to get their finances in order and build a competitive model. “Celtic fans know the reason why Rangers went bankrupt,” Brazil said. “To say that they are ‘recovering’ from being bankrupt is just nonsense.”
Despite being a Celtic fan, Brazil expressed his desire for a strong Rangers to make the Scottish Premiership more competitive. “I want a strong Rangers,” he said. “I do. Obviously I want Celtic to win it, but I want a strong Rangers to make it really exciting.” This sentiment highlights the importance of financial stability and competitiveness in maintaining a healthy and engaging league.
